Budget Debate a Defining Moment for GOP, Groups Say
July 7, 2008 - 8:31 PM
(CNSNews.com) - The current debate over federal spending is a defining moment for the Republican Party, which not only could lose seats in Congress during the 2006 election, but might also saddle future generations with tremendous debt, leaders from several conservative groups said on Capitol Hill Thursday.
"This is a defining moment," stated Pat Toomey, a former member of the U.S. House of Representatives who now serves as president of the Club for Growth. "The Republican Party came into power in 1995 by advocating limited government, but in the last four or five years, there has been no evidence that GOP officials in the federal government have any remaining commitment to this vital principle."
According to David Keene, president of the American Conservative Union, the rapid growth of the federal debt is in large part due to massive increases in entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.
Discretionary spending increased by 48.4 percent during George W. Bush's first term in the White House, Keene said. That amount is more than twice the 21.6 percent increase during Bill Clinton's administration and "embarrassingly higher than the 48.3 percent increase resulting from Lyndon Johnson's entire discretionary spending spree," on the Great Society programs.
Keene added that during the past few months, President Bush signed the $286 billion Transportation Equity Act and the government pledged to spend tens of billions of dollars to pay for hurricane relief along the Gulf Coast, pushing the federal debt toward a record amount of more than $8 trillion.
"The level of pork-barrel expenditures in congressional spending is intolerable," said Chuck Donovan, executive vice president of the Family Research Council. "Excess government spending threatens pro-family tax cuts, like the child tax credit and marriage penalty relief, which should be made permanent features of the tax code."
As a result, Congress and the president face a critical test, said Edwin Feulner, president of the Heritage Foundation.
"The American people are calling for fiscal sanity," Feulner stated. "The question is: can Washington muster the political spine to act responsibly? I am optimistic that our elected representatives can, with courage, lead us on the right path.
"The president has called for offsets to pay for hurricane relief and rebuilding and the House leadership responded with a plan to pare spending growth," he said. "These are good first steps, but already, there is slippage. Some members have balked at modest 2 percent across-the-board spending cuts.
"Congress must do more, not less," Feulner added. "I believe that any member of Congress who cares about responsible spending must do two things: End pork barrel spending and postpone the new Medicare drug entitlement for at least one year. These two measures would save taxpayers $66 billion in the first year alone."
Efforts to reduce the deficit by a few billion dollars over the next five years are insufficient, Keene said, considering the $7.99 trillion federal debt. "No appropriation bill or program -- either discretionary or mandatory -- should be off the table when it comes to finding ways to cut spending," he said.
Feulner called on the president to "give an ironclad promise to veto any bill that crosses his desk with earmarks attached -- whatever it is. There must be no compromise on that."
Toomey added that it is an "unfortunate fact" that "achieving some modicum of fiscal discipline will have to be done by Republicans alone.
"Thus far, no Democrats have shown any interest in controlling spending. They want to make the problem worse," Toomey alleged. "But it is Republicans who have majorities in Congress, so they have the responsibility."
However, Feulner offered praise for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who vowed to give back most of her earmark expenditures in the highway bill to provide help for Katrina victims. "The rest of Congress should join those members of both parties who are willing to give up their earmarks," he said.
Failing to act swiftly on the problem would put the nation "on a path to fiscal disaster," Feulner added. "We are less than one generation from Congress being unable to pay for anything other than Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and interest on the federal debt -- leaving not so much as a penny for defense or homeland security.
"To meet our existing promises without exploding deficits, federal taxes would have to grow more than 50 percent by 2030," he noted. "It's a future our children cannot afford."
Toomey stated that the GOP would not have to wait long to experience consequences of continued "fiscal irresponsibility."
"If Republicans can't see the need to rein in federal spending, they will have abandoned the one big idea that unites the Republican coalition," he said. "And if that happens, core elements of that coalition may in fact abandon the Republican Party before the 2006 elections."
See Earlier Stories:
GOP Facing More Budget Heat, Left and Right (Oct. 20, 2005)
GOP 'Spending Spree' Threatens Party's Grip on Power (Oct. 5, 2005)
Make media inquiries or request an interview with Randy Hall.
Subscribe to the free CNSNews.com daily E-Brief.
E-mail a comment or news tip to Randy Hall.
Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.