Judge lets weapons case proceed to trial in NYC

July 11, 2011 - 7:59 PM

NEW YORK (AP) — A judge Monday rejected an ex-Soviet officer's attempt to dismiss the weapons-dealing case against him on the grounds that he has no connection to the United States and that U.S. conduct in the case was outrageous.

U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin wrote that the law only requires that Viktor Bout acknowledge that he knew the crimes he was accused of would harm the United States for him to be brought to Manhattan for trial. She said prosecutors sufficiently allege that he did so in March 2008 at a two-hour tape recorded meeting in Bangkok, Thailand with U.S. operatives posing as representatives of Colombia terrorists.

Prosecutors say Bout indicated at that meeting that he understood that the confidential sources wanted to buy weapons to use against U.S. forces in Colombia and said that the United States was also his enemy.

Bout was brought to the United States last year from Thailand to face charges that he conspired to sell weapons to a terrorist group. Prosecutors say they have audio tapes of Bout discussing the arms deals. The government said Bout said he would prepare everything that was needed after the confidential sources advised that the terrorist group planned to use anti-aircraft weapons to kill American pilots, according to evidence cited by the judge.

Bout, who is scheduled for trial in October, has pleaded not guilty to charges that he conspired to sell millions of dollars of weapons to men posing as members of the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucianarios de Colombia, or FARC, a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization operating in Colombia. Prosecutors say he offered to sell 700 to 800 surface-to-air missiles, 5,000 AK-47 firearms, millions of rounds of ammunition, land mines, night-vision equipment and ultra-light airplanes that could carry missiles.

The Russian government has complained that his extradition to the United States from Thailand last year was unlawful and political. And his lawyers argued in court that he was being prosecuted for "purely political reasons" after authorities realized the U.S. military continued hiring Bout's companies to supply U.S. soldiers in Iraq even after he was banned in July 2004 by the Department of the Treasury from doing business with the U.S.

Bout's lawyer, Albert Y. Dayan, said he had not yet read the decision and had no immediate reaction to it. On Thursday, he filed papers in the case in which he said the catalyst for the investigation that resulted in Bout's arrest began at the White House in 2007.

"We have found no comparable reported case in United States legal history wherein high United States officials targeted and caused the dogged pursuit and prosecution of a named individual for purely political reasons," he wrote.

He said Bout had never before been charged with a crime in any country involving illegal arms trafficking or arming violent dictators and no one had ever accused him of contemplating a crime against the United States until the sting operation that resulted in his 2008 arrest.

Scheindlin wrote that she will rule at a later point on Dayan's request that the case be tossed out on the grounds of vindictive prosecution, unlawful extradition and other arguments.