Senate Democrats add millionaire tax to jobs bill

October 5, 2011 - 9:15 PM
Obama Jobs

President Barack Obama speaks to students at Eastfield College in Mesquite, Texas about the need for Congress to pass the American Jobs Act on Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2011. (AP Photo/The Dallas Morning News, Sonya N. Hebert) MANDATORY CREDIT; MAGS OUT; TV OUT; INTERNET USE BY AP MEMBERS ONLY

WASHINGTON (AP) — Struggling to deliver the big jobs package proposed by President Barack Obama, Senate Democrats are using the issue to force Republican senators to vote on tax increases for millionaires, picking up on a White House theme that the nation's wealthiest Americans aren't paying their fair share.

Senate Democrats said Wednesday they were changing Obama's jobs package to add a 5.6 percent tax on income above $1 million, a proposal that is sure to be blocked by Republicans.

The $447 billion package still includes Obama's proposals to cut payroll taxes and provide money for teachers, firefighters, the unemployed and infrastructure. The tax on millionaires is expected to pay for the package, so it wouldn't add to the budget deficit.

Democrats are banking on Republicans to oppose both the higher taxes on million-dollar earners and the president's call for new spending aimed at reducing joblessness, leaving them open to a charge of protecting the wealthy at the expense of the unemployed.

"Republicans will be hard pressed to explain why they allowed teachers and firefighters to be laid off, rather than have millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share," said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. "Republicans will struggle to defend putting off repairs to crumbling schools in order to protect tax breaks for the wealthiest 1 percent of America. This is the contrast that will be on display in the Senate next week."

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he plans to bring the bill up for a vote in the Senate next week, though without Republican support, it won't get the 60 votes needed to advance. Republican leaders said they won't support tax increases, even on the wealthy, because they would hurt an already weak economy.

"I understand our Democrat friends want to jettison entire parts of the bill altogether — not to make it more effective at growing jobs, not to grow bipartisan support," said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. "No, they want to overhaul the bill to sharpen its political edge."

The new 5.6 percent tax would be applied to adjusted gross income above $1 million — that's income before itemized deductions are subtracted — including income from capital gains and dividends. The top tax rate on earned income is currently 35 percent. The top capital gains tax rate is 15 percent.

Reid initially announced Wednesday afternoon that he was changing Obama's jobs package to add a new 5 percent tax on income above $1 million, starting Jan. 1. That proposal, however, would have raised taxes a year ahead of Obama's schedule. The president has said raising taxes during a weak economy is not a good idea and, campaigning for his jobs bill in Cincinnati last month, he made a point of noting that his tax increases would not kick in until 2013. "Nobody is talking about raising taxes right now," he said.

Late Wednesday, Reid's office announced that the package had been changed to impose a 5.6 percent tax increase on income above $1 million, starting in 2013.

Democratic leaders in Congress point to recent polls showing support for increasing taxes on the wealthy.

A Washington Post-ABC News released this week said 75 percent of respondents supported raising taxes on Americans with incomes over $1 million a year. That same poll found that 52 percent of respondents supported Obama's jobs package, and 36 percent opposed it.

Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, recalled that previous proposals to raise taxes on millionaires had failed, with some Democrats joining Republicans in opposition.

"Some of my Democrat colleagues were right to reject a similar proposal when they controlled both chambers of Congress," Hatch said. "Given the weak state of our economy, they'd be wise to reject it again."

___

Associated Press writer Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this report.